<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.insanejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/'>
<channel>
  <title>racetrack knows you wank</title>
  <link>http://racetrack.insanejournal.com/</link>
  <description>racetrack knows you wank - InsaneJournal</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:39:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / InsaneJournal</generator>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://racetrack.insanejournal.com/185220.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Free Accounts w/Photobucket/Icon Limit Stuff.</title>
  <link>http://racetrack.insanejournal.com/185220.html</link>
  <description>So I was going through some of the icon makers out there that I commonly use for searching for PBs, and I&apos;m finding a VERY startling trend. I&apos;ve counted 10 different icon-makers who currently have &quot;used&quot; &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;25 gig&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; of bandwidth (some in half a month; some with a week left). That&apos;s what you get with a free account with Photobucket. I just don&apos;t see how THAT many icon-makers are spiking over 25 gig of traffic, ALL in the same month. It just sounds... fishy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Straight from the website. &lt;b&gt;&quot;Huge Bandwidth - Up to 25 GB of monthly traffic. Bandwidth is reset every month.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I currently have all of my icons on my own domain, so in looking at my detailed bandwidth usage. Over the two years I&apos;ve used the domain, my icons have steadily gone up and up. Now I realized that my icon journal is not as popular as most others -- and that is no problem -- but last month, but icon&apos;s bandwidth usage JUMPED four gig. Might not seem like a lot, but when you consider that it&apos;s been pretty steady at 11.5-12.95 gigs, that&apos;s a huge jump. So. I went to look, and there&apos;s a few xanga (&lt;span class=&apos;ljuser&apos; lj:user=&apos;peacocks&apos; style=&apos;white-space: nowrap;&apos;&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://peacocks.insanejournal.com/profile&apos;&gt;&lt;img src=&apos;http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif&apos; alt=&apos;[info]&apos; width=&apos;17&apos; height=&apos;17&apos; style=&apos;vertical-align: bottom; border: 0;&apos; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://peacocks.insanejournal.com/&apos;&gt;&lt;b&gt;peacocks&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, yours are on one of these too) websites hotlinking, some forums, and some random other places. It&apos;s not a lot, actually. But it got me thinking... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I really don&apos;t think that icon-makers are going over 25 gig of bandwidth on their own, and I really wish I could take a look for y&apos;all and see where the traffic was going. You can do a site:url search on Google (Google images seems to be the best way to go about that). I found that &lt;span class=&apos;ljuser&apos; lj:user=&apos;spock&apos; style=&apos;white-space: nowrap;&apos;&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://spock.insanejournal.com/profile&apos;&gt;&lt;img src=&apos;http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif&apos; alt=&apos;[info]&apos; width=&apos;17&apos; height=&apos;17&apos; style=&apos;vertical-align: bottom; border: 0;&apos; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://spock.insanejournal.com/&apos;&gt;&lt;b&gt;spock&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; has a handful of people hotlinking from MySpace and a proboard. I don&apos;t know how often Google caches things though. And I also have no answers for those with free accounts. Obviously, you can lock the folders, but there&apos;s nothing to stop people from leeching your bandwidth with the right url, short of changing every single URLs address. I hope that I&apos;m wrong about that. Anyone know if changing your folders to private/password protected keeps people from actually using the direct links to hotlink?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The other option is that Photobucket messed up on free accounts this month and somehow set EVERYONE&apos;s bandwidth lower or just had a hiccup. With as many people who have had the hiccup, I think questioning them might be an option. I realize it&apos;s free, but they may not be aware that something is messed up. It&apos;s all in how you go about it, so be nice if you decide to. XD</description>
  <comments>http://racetrack.insanejournal.com/185220.html</comments>
  <category>graphics: frakkingcylon</category>
  <category>rl: wtfery</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
